Drawing for DOOR 2000

USPTO serial 79016364

DOOR 2000

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3251923Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 12, 2007
Examiner
MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOOR 2000?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Doors, of metal; metal safe doors; door and window frames, of metalSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
019Doors, not of metal; door and window frames of wood; door and window frames of PVCSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
020Venetian blinds; window blinds; non-metal door bolts; non-metal bolts; plastic garage door rollers; plastic doorknobs; wood doorknobs; doors for furniture; plastic handles for doors; wood handles for doors; non-metal hinges; plastic key chain tags; non-metal key chains; key fobs, not of metal; non-metal key holders; non-metal key rings; plastic key tags; plastic card keys; plastic knobs; wood knobs; non-metal lock boxes; lockers; window shadesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Feb 12, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 5, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Apr 3, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Apr 3, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Sep 17, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jan 17, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Dec 7, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 5, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 5, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 12, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 10, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 18, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 21, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jul 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 26, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 26, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 19, 2006CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED
Apr 6, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 14, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 13, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 11, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 3, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance