Drawing for XTENITY

USPTO serial 79016367

XTENITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3154376Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 10, 2006
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XTENITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward W. Goodman, Edward Blocker, Michael E. Marion, Jack E. Haken

EDWARD W GOODMAN PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N AMERICA CORPPO BOX 3001BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY 10510-8001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for medical office applications, namely, for use in recording, checking, distributing, analyzing and reporting medical images and information by and among health care professionals; computer software for use in supporting medical diagnostics and treatment by storing and categorizing patient health care information; computer software for use by health care professionals to store patient records in the nature of digital images and related patient information; and computer software for use in diagnosing patient illnesses and maladies by analyzing information on patients' symptoms and comparing this information with a database of recognized symptoms for various illnesses and maladiesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Oct 23, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 19, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 4, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Nov 4, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jun 12, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 8, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Sep 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Mar 9, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jun 6, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 15, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 15, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 10, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 28, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 1, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 26, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 22, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
May 22, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 22, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 16, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 11, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 17, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 15, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 3, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance