Drawing for ONEPHONE

USPTO serial 79016379

ONEPHONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3508762Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 30, 2008
Examiner
JORDAN, AMEETA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONEPHONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Glen Mitchell

GLENN MITCHELL BERGENSTRÅHLE & LINDVALL ABBOX 17704SE-118 93 STOCKHOLM,SWEDEN

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunications services, namely, providing local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics, by means of telephone, all for the commercial sector, based upon the interoperability of fixed and wireless transmissionSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
May 5, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
May 5, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 5, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Mar 5, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jan 1, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 1, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jan 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 19, 2009IRFIIRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 16, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 16, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 30, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 30, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 10, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 25, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 11, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 2, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 2, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 30, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Apr 30, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Mar 11, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 11, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 11, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 30, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 13, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 13, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 25, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 18, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jul 11, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 6, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jul 2, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Jul 2, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 26, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 5, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 5, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 22, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 8, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 3, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 10, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 6, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 4, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 14, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 14, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 12, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 3, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance