USPTO serial 79016437
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Atti-La Dahlgren c/o Swiss Pharmaceutical Industries S.A.
CH
Other trademarks owned by Atti-La Dahlgren c/o Swiss Pharmaceutical Industries S.A.
Atti-La Dahlgren c/o Swiss Pharmaceutical Industries S.A.
CH
Other trademarks owned by Atti-La Dahlgren c/o Swiss Pharmaceutical Industries S.A.
Atti-La Dahlgren c/o Swiss Pharmaceutical Industries S.A.
CH
Other trademarks owned by Atti-La Dahlgren c/o Swiss Pharmaceutical Industries S.A.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK I PEROFF
MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHARTNICHOLSON GRAHAM LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Deodorant soap, medicated soap, skin soap, liquid soap for hands, face and body; essential oils for personal use; make-up; skin-care products, namely, skin cream, skin emollients, skin gels for accelerating, enhancing or extending tans, skin moisturizer, skin texturizer; dentifrices; cosmetics; hair lotions | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, medicines, liquids, supplements, creams, solutions and ointments for the treatment of dry skin and sun-damaged skin; dietetic substances adapted for medical use, namely, dietary food supplements, dietary drink mix for use as a meal replacement,food for medically-restricted diets, and meal replacement and dietary supplement drink mixes; food for babies; medical plasters; medicated cosmetics; medicated hair lotions | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |