USPTO serial 79016447
WERKMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3356507Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 18, 2007
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with WERKMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Commanditaire vennootschap Hoefijzerfabriek Werkman & Co.
NL-9721 BT Groningen, NL
Other trademarks owned by Commanditaire vennootschap Hoefijzerfabriek Werkman & Co.
Commanditaire vennootschap Hoefijzerfabriek Werkman & Co.
NL-9721 BT Groningen, NL
Other trademarks owned by Commanditaire vennootschap Hoefijzerfabriek Werkman & Co.
NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence R. Robins
Lawrence R. Robins FisherBroyles LLP4 MacQuarrie LaneWestford, MA 01886UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Horseshoe nails; horseshoes made of metal; anvils | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | [ Hand tools, namely, hammers, chisels, nippers, nail pullers, pincers, rasps, handheld cutting tools, creasers for use with animal hooves, forepunches for use with animal hooves, gouges for use with animal hooves, pritchels for use with animal hooves, hoof blades for use with animal hooves, knives, pull-off and horseshoe spreaders for use with animal hooves, clinchers for use with animal hooves, hoof testers for use with animal hooves, tongs, files and whetstones, and hand tool handles for use with all of the above ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | [ Retail store services for horse products ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Commanditaire vennootschap Hoefijzerfabriek Werkman & Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Commanditaire vennootschap Hoefijzerfabriek Werkman & Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Werkman Hoofcare B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named WERKMAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 28, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 9, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2006 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |