USPTO serial 79016478
EAST INDIA COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EAST INDIA COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | apparatus for recording, transmission, or reproduction of sound or images; automatic vending machines; cash registers; computers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 1, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 3, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |