USPTO serial 79016488
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
KALESERAMIK ÇANAKKALE KALEBODUR SERAMIK SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
Binasi Levent; Istanbul, TR
Other trademarks owned by KALESERAMIK ÇANAKKALE KALEBODUR SERAMIK SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
KALESERAMIK ÇANAKKALE KALEBODUR SERAMIK SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
Binasi Levent; Istanbul, TR
Other trademarks owned by KALESERAMIK ÇANAKKALE KALEBODUR SERAMIK SANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
KALESERAMIK ÇANAKKALE KALEBODUR SERAMIKSSANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
Binasi Levent; Istanbul, TR
Other trademarks owned by KALESERAMIK ÇANAKKALE KALEBODUR SERAMIKSSANAYI ANONIM SIRKETI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
P. Jay Hines
P. Jay Hines Mucny, Geissler, Olds & Lowe P.C.4000 Legato RoadSuite 310Fairfax, VA 22033| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical insulators with low and high tension | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | PBIR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |