Drawing for SAUNAKING

USPTO serial 79016490

SAUNAKING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SHEFFIELD, SHARI
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAUNAKING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Heating apparatus; electric heating apparatus; hot air bath fittings; heaters for baths; bath installations; sanitary apparatus and installations; fumigation apparatus, not for medical purposes; sauna bath installations; shower cubicles; steam facial apparatus (saunas)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2016UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Dec 12, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 11, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 6, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Sep 7, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 1, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 1, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 26, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 12, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 12, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 29, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Jul 31, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 28, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 21, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 20, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 10, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance