Drawing for MAXAM

USPTO serial 79016518

MAXAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3199050Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 16, 2007
Examiner
TANNER,MICHAEL R
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with MAXAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $797*

Plus Government fees of $1,950

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bradley M. Stohry

Bradley M. Stohry Reichel Stohry Dean LLP6151 Central AveIndianapolis, IN 46220United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
013Firearms; ammunition and shells; explosives [; fireworks]ACTIVE
035Business management; commercial management [; retail store services featuring all types of explosives, ammunition, explosive shells and fireworks]ACTIVE
040Services of processing of explosive materials, namely, custom manufacture of explosives, ammunition, explosive shells [and fireworks]ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Mar 5, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 5, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 5, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Mar 5, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Feb 13, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 4, 2023CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
May 23, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 16, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Feb 5, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 5, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Feb 1, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 1, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 1, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
May 31, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 13, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jan 16, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Sep 10, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jul 24, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jul 24, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jul 19, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 16, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Feb 24, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 26, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 21, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Jan 2, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 17, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 17, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 12, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 16, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 24, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Aug 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 23, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 23, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 1, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 24, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 6, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 6, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 4, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 10, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance