USPTO serial 79016534
TK TURBOKIT S.L.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3272512Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 31, 2007
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TK TURBOKIT S.L.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald L. Dennison
Donald L. Dennison Stakeholder Brands, LLC11209 Farmland DriveRockville, MD 20852UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Speed regulators and governors for use in motorcycle and moped engines; variable speed gears for motorcycles and mopeds; exhausts for motors and engines; and motorcycle exhausts | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Motorcycles and mopeds; saddles; rearview mirrors; fuel tank caps; semi-fitted motorcycle and moped covers; tires for motorcycles and mopeds; shock absorbers; mudguards; brakes; trunks and luggage carriers, all for motorcycles and mopeds; and structural parts for motorcycles and rnopeds | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TURBO KIT, S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by TURBO KIT, S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by TURBO KIT, S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by D. Francisco José MARTINEZ ALMANSA y D. Salvador PÉREZ MERCADER
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named TK TURBOKIT S.L.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 15, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |