USPTO serial 79016539
Serial No. 79016539
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3476724Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 29, 2008
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with Serial No. 79016539?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard J. Groos
Richard J. Groos King & Spalding LLP500 West 2nd Street, 1800Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for the paper and graphic industry, namely, print converting machines for the graphic industry, paper coating machines, paper cutting machines, paper shredding machines; printing machines for aluminum holders, namely, flexographic printing machines; labels and forms machines, namely, label printing machines for producing labels and forms; [ ball bearings for agricultural machines, conveying equipment, namely, air conveyors; covered or uncovered bearings for aluminum structures, namely, roller bearings for machines; automatic bottle batcher machines and bearings therefor; equipment for bakeries, namely, kneading machines and ball bearings therefor; ball-motion parts for bicycles, namely, ball bearings for bicycles, beer-house plant machines, cable cranes, index card holders, and index card storage boxes; ball bearings for metal door hinges; axial bearings for door hinges; ball bearings for metal drawer rails; ball bearings for food-smoking plants and miscellaneous galvanic-bath plants; covered and uncovered ball bearings for industrial doors; ] covered and uncovered ball bearings; [ for garage doors, hospital doors, industrials doors, metal and non-metal lift doors; covered and uncovered ball bearings and protection guards for lift doors, milk industry machines, ] packaging machines; [ revolving cloth holders, and both metal and non-metal roller shutters; covered and uncovered ball bearings for warehouse shelves, shower boxes and for sliding elements used in doors; metal runners for sliding doors; non-metal runners for sliding doors; plastic covered ball bearings for sliding doors; covered and uncovered ball bearings for metal and non-metal window frames and weighbridge doors; plastic covered ball bearings for window frames; ball bearings for sports-hall tools, machines stands, suitcases, textile machines, truck sliding covers, varnishing plants and washing equipment; ball bearings for roller skates and toys used as skates; ball bearings for white goods, namely, ball bearings for large household appliances; ] ball bearings for the packaging and printing industry; wrapping and packaging machinery, namely, wrapping machines, packaging machines and ball bearings therefor; hot foil machines for making labels and films in the nature of tip to tip and derl systems; gluing machine components, namely, gluing machine units used on gluing machines to facilitate gluing, embossing and engraving of sheets of handkerchiefs; gluing machines for embossing handkerchiefs; [ and ball bearings thereof; hospital beds; patient examination tables, namely, radiological tables and ball bearings therefor; ball bearings for civil and industrial machinery and equipment; protective sliding metal doors for machines and ball bearings therefor, plastic covered and uncovered ball bearings for machinery protection and the protection of sliding doors in machinery; metal and non-metal fire protection doors; plastic covered and uncovered ball bearings for metal rails for protection guard machines and for the handling of big dimension exhibition equipment, elevators and ball bearings for sliding doors of elevators; ball bearings for furniture, chairs, and sets of drawers; ball bearings for printers and copiers, revolving cloth holders, roller shutters, roll-gravity and wheel conveyors, and scales; wheels for lawnmowers, wheels for trolleys and wheelbarrows, replacement rollers for roller skate wheels, ball bearings of wheels for toys vehicles, and ball bearings for the aforementioned wheels; ball bearings for wood-processing machines; for rollers used in the food industry, for food product machinery, and for ] machines used in the packaging, printing, wrapping and packaging machinery industries [, cutting plotters and ball bearings therefor ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 15, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 16, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 13, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 25, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |