Drawing for HIMAX

USPTO serial 79016553

HIMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3187609Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 19, 2006
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with HIMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David R. Lipson

David R. Lipson RAPHAEL BELLUM PLLC3190 Fairview Park DriveSuite 1070Falls Church, VA 22042

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Safe against intrinsic errors and non-safety-related memory-programmable and hard-wired wiring-programmable electronic systems in the nature of an electronic controller for the safe operation of machines; safe against intrinsic errors and non-safety-related memory-programmable and hard-wired wiring-programmable electronic systems in the nature of electronic controllers for the control and closed-loop control of automation processesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Apr 17, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
May 7, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 7, 2024EWORTEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED
May 7, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 7, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
May 7, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Apr 21, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 2, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
May 2, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
May 1, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Nov 29, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Dec 19, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 2, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Apr 18, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 8, 2015CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 12, 2013NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - MAILED
Aug 12, 201315AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED
Aug 1, 201315AFREGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED
Aug 1, 2013E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED
Sep 13, 2012CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Sep 8, 2012CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 15, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED
Jun 15, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 15, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 3, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Mar 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 25, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 25, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jul 24, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 19, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 3, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 14, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 8, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 18, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 10, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 1, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 10, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance