Drawing for BIOM

USPTO serial 79016585

BIOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3359885Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 25, 2007
Examiner
WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with BIOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*

Plus Government fees of $1,300

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter B. Bromaghim

Peter B. Bromaghim Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman LLP12400 Wilshire Boulevard, 7th FloorLOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1040UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Ophthalmologic apparatus and instruments for scientific use, namely, electronic eye scanners, computer hardware and operating software for use therewith for ophthalmologic applications; photographic apparatus, namely, cameras; magnifying glasses and lenses; magnets and magnetic instruments, namely, magnetometers, cardiometric apparatus, namely, ophthalmic microscopes; electro magnets; frames and lenses for spectacles; measuring glasses; colorimeters; optical prisms; optical filters; contact lenses; computer peripheral devices; blank magnetic, magneto-optical and optical data media data carriers; microscopes; refractometersACTIVE—
010Ophthalmological apparatus and instruments for medical use, namely, ophthalmoscopes and ophthalmometers; medical diagnostic eye testing apparatus, namely, Scheimpflug cameras; surgical instruments for treating eye diseases, eye disorders, and eye defects; optometric instruments, namely, instruments for measuring the diameter of ophthalmic lenses; optometric instruments for locating the optical center of ophthalmic lenses; electronic medical diagnostic eye testing apparatus, namely YAG, diode and excimer lasersACTIVE—
042[ Design and development of computer hardware and software for others ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 12, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 24, 2018INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
May 22, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 22, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 22, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 30, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 6, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 14, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 23, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Mar 23, 2013C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 23, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 1, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 1, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 8, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 25, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 1, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 17, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 16, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 29, 2007RGIAREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED—
May 29, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 29, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 26, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 12, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 30, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 15, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 11, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance