USPTO serial 79016585
BIOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3359885Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 25, 2007
- Examiner
- WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with BIOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter B. Bromaghim
Peter B. Bromaghim Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman LLP12400 Wilshire Boulevard, 7th FloorLOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1040UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Ophthalmologic apparatus and instruments for scientific use, namely, electronic eye scanners, computer hardware and operating software for use therewith for ophthalmologic applications; photographic apparatus, namely, cameras; magnifying glasses and lenses; magnets and magnetic instruments, namely, magnetometers, cardiometric apparatus, namely, ophthalmic microscopes; electro magnets; frames and lenses for spectacles; measuring glasses; colorimeters; optical prisms; optical filters; contact lenses; computer peripheral devices; blank magnetic, magneto-optical and optical data media data carriers; microscopes; refractometers | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Ophthalmological apparatus and instruments for medical use, namely, ophthalmoscopes and ophthalmometers; medical diagnostic eye testing apparatus, namely, Scheimpflug cameras; surgical instruments for treating eye diseases, eye disorders, and eye defects; optometric instruments, namely, instruments for measuring the diameter of ophthalmic lenses; optometric instruments for locating the optical center of ophthalmic lenses; electronic medical diagnostic eye testing apparatus, namely YAG, diode and excimer lasers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | [ Design and development of computer hardware and software for others ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BIOM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 12, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 23, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2013 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 23, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2007 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 11, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |