Drawing for TECHNIDATA

USPTO serial 79016609

TECHNIDATA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3307427Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 9, 2007
Examiner
BESCH, JAY C
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with TECHNIDATA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $797*

Plus Government fees of $1,950

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melissa A. Nowak

Melissa A. Nowak Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3600Seattle, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ Apparatus for recording, transmitting, reproducing sound or images; data processing equipment for use in clinical diagnosis, namely, data processors, couplers; computers for clinical diagnosis data; ] computer software for use in the management of clinical diagnosis information computer programs recorded on data media for managing clinical information in the field of clinical diagnosis; computer operating programs [ ; computer peripheral devices; computers; magnetic identity cards; barcode readers; scanners ]ACTIVE
010Apparatus for clinical diagnosisACTIVE
042[ Scientific research in the field of clinical diagnosis; ] computer programming for others in the field of clinical diagnosis; computer software design for others in the field of clinical diagnosis; updating of computer software for others in the field of clinical diagnosis; research and development for new products in the field of clinical diagnosis; computer consulting in the field of clinical diagnosis; licensing of computer software in the field of clinical diagnosis; rental of computer software in the field of clinical diagnosisACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2020LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jan 3, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Nov 1, 2019LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Apr 19, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 11, 2018INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Jun 5, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Oct 5, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Oct 5, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Sep 29, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Oct 9, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 10, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Dec 30, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Dec 30, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jun 11, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Oct 11, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Oct 11, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Oct 11, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Oct 8, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED
Oct 8, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Dec 11, 2009RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Dec 25, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 22, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 22, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jan 15, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 9, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 20, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 14, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 24, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 26, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 12, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 12, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 6, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 11, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 11, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 14, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 7, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Sep 7, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Mar 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 23, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 22, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 10, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance