Drawing for TECHNIDATA

USPTO serial 79016609

TECHNIDATA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3307427Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 9, 2007
Examiner
BESCH, JAY C
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with TECHNIDATA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*

Plus Government fees of $1,950

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melissa A. Nowak

Melissa A. Nowak Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3600Seattle, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ Apparatus for recording, transmitting, reproducing sound or images; data processing equipment for use in clinical diagnosis, namely, data processors, couplers; computers for clinical diagnosis data; ] computer software for use in the management of clinical diagnosis information computer programs recorded on data media for managing clinical information in the field of clinical diagnosis; computer operating programs [ ; computer peripheral devices; computers; magnetic identity cards; barcode readers; scanners ]ACTIVE—
010Apparatus for clinical diagnosisACTIVE—
042[ Scientific research in the field of clinical diagnosis; ] computer programming for others in the field of clinical diagnosis; computer software design for others in the field of clinical diagnosis; updating of computer software for others in the field of clinical diagnosis; research and development for new products in the field of clinical diagnosis; computer consulting in the field of clinical diagnosis; licensing of computer software in the field of clinical diagnosis; rental of computer software in the field of clinical diagnosisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2020LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jan 3, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 1, 2019LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 19, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2018INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 5, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 29, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 30, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 30, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jun 11, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 11, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 11, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 8, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Oct 8, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2009RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 25, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 22, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 15, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 20, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 14, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 24, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 26, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 12, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 11, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 14, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 23, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 22, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance