USPTO serial 79016673
LIMSEEDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3162890Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 24, 2006
- Examiner
- HIRSCHMAN, PAMELA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIMSEEDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Sheehan Anderson
Jennifer Sheehan Anderson Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPSuite 10139400 Woodward AvenueBLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5151Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Agricultural, horticultural and forestry products, namely, live asparagus plants; [ agricultural grains for planting; live animals; fresh fruits and vegetables; ] seeds, namely, asparagus seeds; [ living plants and flowers; foodstuffs for animals, malt for brewing and distilling ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 24, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |