Drawing for ORION GAMING

USPTO serial 79016722

ORION GAMING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BELZER, LYDIA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORION GAMING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEVEN P. MACALUSO

STEVEN P. MACALUSO WMS GAMING INC.800 SOUTH NORTHPOINT BOULEVARDWAUKEGAN, IL 60085UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Automatic gambling apparatus and automatic amusement machines adapted for use with television receivers only; namely gambling machines and slot machines with or without video input; video game, computer, electronic game software for automatic gambling apparatus and automatic amusement machines; apparatus for recording, transmission and reproduction of sound and imagesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
028Games and playthings, namely board games, card games, and action skill gamesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
035Business intermediary services, namely negotiating and exploiting automatic gambling apparatus and automatic amusement machines for othersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Sep 4, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 11, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 17, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 9, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 5, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 5, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 18, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 5, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Sep 5, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Sep 5, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Jun 22, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 22, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 19, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 19, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 16, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Apr 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 25, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 22, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Sep 6, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 31, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED
Jul 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 27, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jul 27, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jun 21, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 21, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 23, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 22, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 17, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance