Drawing for REPO SHEET

USPTO serial 79016732

REPO SHEET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3213621Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 27, 2007
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with REPO SHEET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Clay A. Tillack

Clay A. Tillack Schiff Hardin LLPP.O. Box 06079CHICAGO, IL 60606-0079UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010MEDICAL APPARATUS, NAMELY, TECHNICAL MEDICAL AIDS FOR HOME AND INSTITUTIONAL USE IN THE NATURE OF STATIONARY AND MOBILE LIFT SYSTEMS FOR THE PURPOSES OF LIFTING AND TURNING PATIENTS COMPRISED OF A MOTOR, OR MECHANICAL DEVICE, AND HARNESS ASSEMBLY AND PARTS AND FITTINGS THEREOF SOLD AS A UNIT; DEVICES FOR SUPPORTING AND CARRYING PATIENTS, NAMELY, STRETCHERSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
May 1, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Dec 17, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 6, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jun 6, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 6, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 10, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Feb 27, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Apr 23, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 21, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Mar 21, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Mar 21, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 26, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Apr 23, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 23, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 23, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Dec 19, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 6, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 12, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 7, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 5, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 20, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 13, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 12, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 12, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Oct 11, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 11, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 2, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 30, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 9, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 16, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 15, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 24, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 4, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 5, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 2, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 17, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance