USPTO serial 79016754
VITABLEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MADDEN, ANNE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VITABLEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurel V. Dineff, Linda J. Nowlin, Justin R. Young, R. Peter Spies
ONEL TRADEMARKSLEEUWENVELDSEWEG 12, NL-1382 LX WEESPNETHERLANDSGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Non-medical additives for the food industry, namely, food flavorings and food fillers for use in savory applications, soups, sauces, beverages, flavorings and aromas; vitaminized dietetic supplements and food supplements, not for medical use, all of plant or animal origin and containing natural substances, namely, fruit and vegetable powders, mineral substances, extracts of microorganisms, trace elements, antioxidants and carbohydrates, namely, infant formula, flour, beverages, dairy, cereals, health foods and margarine | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Non-medical additives for the food industry, namely, food flavorings and food fillers for use in savory applications, soups, sauces, beverages, flavorings and aromas; vitaminized dietetic supplements and food supplements, not for medical use, all of natural origin and containing natural substances, namely, fruit and vegetable powders, mineral substances, extracts of microorganisms, trace elements, antioxidants and carbohydrates, namely, infant formula, flour, beverages, dairy, cereals, health foods and margarine | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 2, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |