Drawing for BASOFLUX

USPTO serial 79016756

BASOFLUX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3324746Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 30, 2007
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with BASOFLUX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sarah M. Robertson

Sarah M. Robertson Dorsey & Whitney LLP1301 Avenue of the AmericasFloor 13New York, NY 10019

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for industrial use, namely, oil field chemicals for controlling bacteria in crude oil production, for removal of residual oil from water in refineries and in crude oil production; chemicals for use in industry, namely, corrosion inhibitors for petroleum and natural gas production plants and processing plants, water-soluble polymers for tertiary crude oil production, pour-point and/or viscosity depressants for crude oils and residual oils, paraffin inhibitors for use in petroleum production and processing, petroleum emulsion breaker for dehydration of crude oil emulsions and for desalination of crude oils, scale inhibitors for petroleum production and processing, surfactants for petroleum production and for pipeline transportationACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 17, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 17, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 17, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 9, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Sep 14, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Sep 14, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Sep 8, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Oct 30, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 22, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Oct 18, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Oct 18, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Oct 18, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Oct 14, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Oct 14, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Oct 14, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 4, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 12, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 5, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 4, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jan 30, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 30, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 14, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 17, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 3, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 19, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 20, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 16, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 4, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 18, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 18, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 15, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 17, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance