USPTO serial 79016789
LAYO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3867503Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 26, 2010
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- MADRID PROCESSING UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LAYO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ursula B. Day
708 3RD AVESTE 1501NEW YORK, NY 10117Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | mayonnaise, gourmet mayonnaise, calorie reduced mayonnaise, and low calorie mayonnaise substitutes in the nature of salad cream | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pahnke-Leimbach-King oHG
- Other trademarks owned by Pahnke-Leimbach-King oHG
- Other trademarks owned by Markenschmiede Strategische Markenentwicklung GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Markenschmiede Strategische Markenentwicklung GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named LAYO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2016 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2009 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |