USPTO serial 79016851
UIMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3272515Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 31, 2007
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UIMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Holmes J. Hawkins, IIII
Holmes J. Hawkins, IIII King & Spalding LLP1180 Peachtree Street, NEAtlanta, GA 30309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Digital cameras, digital video disc drivers, digital and optical transmitters, ] digital signal processors, digital input and output scanners, stand alone displays for medical images, in particular in digital format, namely, for recording, transmission or reproduction of x-ray images, CT images, MRI images, PET images, ultrasound images, endoscope images; data processing computers for controlling, monitoring or performing of x-ray images, CT images, MRI images, PET images, ultrasound images, endoscope images; [ LCD flat panel monitors, computers and data processors for controlling, monitoring or performing industrial processes or scientific research in laboratories, namely, for controlling, monitoring or performing of x-ray images, CT images, MRI images, PET images, ultrasound images, endoscope images; ] computer software for use in data processing of medical data; computer software for controlling medical and medical-technical apparatus, namely, computer software for recording, transmission, controlling, monitoring, analyzing or reproduction of x-ray images, CT images MRI images, PET images, ultrasound images, endoscope images for medical diagnosis and treatment by medical professionals; software for medical use, namely, for controlling, monitoring or performing of x-ray images, CT images, MRI images, PET images, ultrasound images, endoscope images; [ digital cameras, digital video disc drivers, digital and optical transmitters, ] digital signal processors, digital input and output scanners, stand alone displays for receiving, recording, transmitting and reproducing signals, images and/or sound for medical use; LCD flat panel monitors, computers and data processors for controlling, monitoring or performing of x-ray images, CT images, MRI images, PET images, ultrasound images, endoscope images for medical use | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Medical and medical-technical apparatus and instruments, namely, lithotripters, urology tables, [ surgical operating tables, orthopedic tables; ] X-ray apparatus for medical use; electro-medical and digital diagnosis and therapy apparatus, namely, for diagnosing and treating with x-ray images, CT images, MRI images, PET images, ultrasound images, endoscopic images; parts of all aforementioned goods | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Medical-technical services, namely, technical counseling and providing technical expert opinions and technical instructions for [ manufacturing, ] operating and maintaining of medical and medical technical apparatus and instruments; [ design and maintenance of computer programs for others; data processing for medical use; ] data analysis for medical use, namely, providing temporary use of non-down-loadable software for data analysis of medical records | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dornier MedTech GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Dornier MedTech GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Dornier MedTech GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named UIMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 10, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |