Drawing for HALLELUJAH

USPTO serial 79016864

HALLELUJAH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3356508Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 18, 2007
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HALLELUJAH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TODD W. EVANS

TODD W EVANS COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029EDIBLE OILS AND FATS; EGGS; FROZEN VEGETABLES; FROZEN FRUITS; PROCESSED FISHERY PRODUCTS, NAMELY, PICKLED FISH; PROCESSED VEGETABLES AND FRUITS; TOFU; PROCESSED EGGS; CURRY, STEW AND SOUP MIXESSECTION 18 - CANCELLED
030MEAT TENDERIZERS FOR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES; TEA; COFFEE AND COCOA; ICE; SEASONINGS; SPICES; ICE CREAM MIXES; SHERBET MIXES; ALMOND PASTE; SANDWICHES; SUSHI; YEAST POWDER; YEAST; BAKING POWDER; HUSKED RICE; HUSKED OATS; HUSKED BARLEY; FLOUR FOR FOOD; GLUTEN FOR FOODSECTION 18 - CANCELLED
043PROVIDING TEMPORARY ACCOMMODATION; PROVIDING KOREAN CUISINE; BOARDING FOR ANIMALS; PRESCHOOLER AND INFANT CARE AT DAYCARE CENTERS; CARING OF THE ELDERLY; PROVIDING CONFERENCE ROOMS; PROVIDING FACILITIES FOR EXHIBITIONSSECTION 18 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 21, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Dec 2, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Dec 2, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jul 8, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 8, 2013C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL
Nov 8, 2013CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Sep 5, 2013CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999
May 13, 2013PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jun 4, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 2, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 2, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Mar 18, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 18, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 28, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 18, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 17, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 17, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 29, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 29, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 4, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 23, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
May 23, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 23, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 23, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 3, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 19, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 19, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2006CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED
Oct 5, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 29, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 2, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 15, 2006ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 24, 2006ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Feb 23, 2006LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
Feb 16, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 31, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 8, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 8, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 17, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance