Drawing for PRIMERO

USPTO serial 79016884

PRIMERO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRIMERO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Bacon; bone oil, edible; butter; chocolate nut butter; cocoa butter; coconut butter for food purposes; peanut butter; butter cream; cheese; fruit chips; potato chips; coconut oil; colza oil for food; corn oil; dairy products, namely, cream; potato crisps; crystallized fruits; edible oils; fish, tinned and canned; potato flakes; fruit jellies; fruit peel; fruit, preserved; fruits, tinned and canned; ham; jams; maize oil; margarine; marmalade; olive oil for food; olives, preserved; palm kernel oil for food; palm oil for food; peanuts, processed; pickles; potato fritters; rape oil for food; sesame oil; sunflower oil for food; vegetables, tinned and cannedSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Feb 26, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 6, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 28, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 28, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 7, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 21, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 21, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 29, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 28, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 18, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 16, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 9, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2006CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED
Sep 21, 2006CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Sep 19, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Apr 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 15, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 14, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 12, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 17, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance