USPTO serial 79016905
MORAVIA WORLDWIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MORAVIA WORLDWIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter S. Sloane
PETER S SLOANE OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICAS 7TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for application and database integration and for use in operating, revising and updating Internet web sites, for foreign language translation, machine translation and adapting Internet web sites, intranets, e-mails and instant messaging to be compatible with international and country specific operating systems and software | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Business project management services for others in the field of language translation; and business intermediary services in the nature of arranging contractual services for the development of computer software to be used to adapt products to other languages and cultures | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Desktop publishing for others | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Language translation, language interpreting and training in the use of computer software and desktop publishing tools | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Development of computer software for secure local area networks; application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; development of computer software for use in adapting web-based applications and texts to a specific international language or culture; computer project management services; development of computer software components for others; computer services, namely, designing and implementing web sites for others; computer software consultation services; information technology consultation; testing of computer software for others; graphic art | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MORAVIA IT a.s.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MORAVIA WORLDWIDE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |