Drawing for WELL CLEANER

USPTO serial 79016944

WELL CLEANER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WELL CLEANER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joan L. Long

JOAN L LONG MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLPPO BOX 2828CHICAGO, IL 60690-2828UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Hydraulic and electric conveyors and replacement parts therefor for use in oil or gas drilling and on oil or gas wells for both land and off-shore applications; hydraulic and electrically driven machine tools, namely machine tools for use in anchoring and loosening of mechanical devices in oil and gas wells; hydraulic and electrically driven machine tools for use in collecting and removing debris from oil and gas wells and replacement parts thereof.SECTION 70 - CANCELLED
009Automatic machines and instruments for controlling hydraulic and electric pressure, depth and flow measure for mechanical hydraulic and electric locking devices for use in pulling coiled tubing and wirelines in oil and gas drilling and on oil and gas wells for both land and off-shore applications; electric apparatus for controlling hydraulic and electric devices for use in anchoring and loosening of mechanical devices in oil and gas wells; electric apparatus for controlling hydraulic and electric devices for use in the loosening and removal of debris in oil and gas wells; replacement parts for the aforementioned goods.SECTION 70 - CANCELLED
037Oil well and gas well repair and installation servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 25, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 3, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 3, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 2, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jul 2, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Jul 2, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jun 29, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
May 3, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 19, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 19, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 17, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Apr 17, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jan 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 19, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 19, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jul 19, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 19, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 28, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 19, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 29, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 27, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 17, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance