USPTO serial 79016944
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joan L. Long
JOAN L LONG MAYER, BROWN, ROWE & MAW LLPPO BOX 2828CHICAGO, IL 60690-2828UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Hydraulic and electric conveyors and replacement parts therefor for use in oil or gas drilling and on oil or gas wells for both land and off-shore applications; hydraulic and electrically driven machine tools, namely machine tools for use in anchoring and loosening of mechanical devices in oil and gas wells; hydraulic and electrically driven machine tools for use in collecting and removing debris from oil and gas wells and replacement parts thereof. | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Automatic machines and instruments for controlling hydraulic and electric pressure, depth and flow measure for mechanical hydraulic and electric locking devices for use in pulling coiled tubing and wirelines in oil and gas drilling and on oil and gas wells for both land and off-shore applications; electric apparatus for controlling hydraulic and electric devices for use in anchoring and loosening of mechanical devices in oil and gas wells; electric apparatus for controlling hydraulic and electric devices for use in the loosening and removal of debris in oil and gas wells; replacement parts for the aforementioned goods. | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Oil well and gas well repair and installation services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |