USPTO serial 79016949
TAORHINO'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3307429Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 9, 2007
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TAORHINO'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRADLEY J. GROSS
TAYLOR WESSING RECHTSANWäLTEISARTORPLATZ 8M NCHEN FED REP, 80331GERMAN DEMOCRATICGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Fruit flavored gum, chewing gum not for medicinal purposes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Beverages, namely mineral water and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages; Non-alcoholic fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups for making beverages; preparations for making fruit drinks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverage produced from a brewed malt base with natural flavors; Alcoholic beverages of fruit. | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by rhino's energy GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by rhino's energy drink and food ag
- Other trademarks owned by rhino's energy drink and food ag
- Other trademarks owned by rhino's energy drink and food ag
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named TAORHINO'S
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2006 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 11, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |