Drawing for LORELEY-GOLD

USPTO serial 79017010

LORELEY-GOLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LORELEY-GOLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bleaching preparations for laundry use, namely, laundry bleach; cleaning preparations for (indicate use, e;g;, hand, automobile, oven); polishing preparations; namely, scouring liquids and scouring powders; soaps; perfumery; essential oils; cosmetics; hair lotions;hair dyeing preparations; dentifricesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
030Coffee; tea; cocoa; sugar; rice; tapioca; sago; artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cerals; bread; pastry and confectionery namely, candy; edible ices; honey; yeast;baking-powder; salt; mustard and ketchup; spices; golden syrupsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 23, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 24, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 2, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 10, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 26, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 26, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 20, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 21, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 17, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 9, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2006UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 7, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance