USPTO serial 79017013
MESHNETICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3516561Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 14, 2008
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MESHNETICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Y. Kim
Richard Y. Kim McDermott Will & Emery LLP600 13th Street, NWWashington, DC 20005-3096UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wireless temperature, humidity and light sensors and local area and wide-area wireless networks; radio frequency and integrated circuit modules comprising wireless sensors; software for operating wireless sensors; wireless network and wireless sensor data integration equipment, namely, evaluation boards and extension modules; wireless network and wireless sensor data integration evaluation and development kits, comprised primarily of OEM modules, consisting primarily of integrated chip transceiver and/or microcontroller, prototyping boards for said modules, USB and serial cables, software for developing wireless and wired applications in home automation, commercial building automation, mete reading, asset tracking, industrial control and related fields, and corresponding documentation in the nature of user guides, datasheets, application notes, flyers, case studies and product briefs sold as a unit therewith; networking stack computer firmware for visualization, processing aggregation and storage of data from said networks; gateway server software, namely, computer software for accessing, controlling and managing said networks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Business management in the field of telecommunication and wireless communication; business administration | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications routing and junction services; providing communication services by wireless electronic communications networks, namely, wireless broadband communication services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Providing educational services in the form of seminars and presentations in the field of telecommunication | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Engineering; technical research for third parties in the field of computer software and hardware; providing software for third parties, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for wireless networks and wireless-enabled devices; computer software development and computer software design for others | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Atmel Switzerland SARL
- Other trademarks owned by LuxLabs Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by LuxLabs Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Luxoft International Company Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Luxoft International Company Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MESHNETICS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 11, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |