Drawing for SEIDEL

USPTO serial 79017038

SEIDEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3602569Status 707Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 7, 2009
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SEIDEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter B. Bromaghim

Peter B. Bromaghim Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP12400 Wilshire BoulevardSuite 700LOS ANGELES, CA 90025

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Common metals and their alloys for use in further manufacturing; metal building materials, namely, aluminum for use in the cosmetic and pharmaceutical industry and for incorporation into writing utensils and automotive accessories; transportable buildings of metal; non-electric cables and wires of common metal; pipes and tubes of metal; metal safes; bottle closures and caps, cap covers for lips ticks, all the aforesaid goods of common metals or combinations thereofACTIVE
020[ Furniture, mirrors, picture frames; furniture of wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of pearl, meerschaum and substitutes for all these materials ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
021Perfume vaporizers, and parts therefor, all of common metals or combinations thereof sold emptyACTIVE
042Scientific research and development; industrial research servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jun 12, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 2, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 21, 2020INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 4, 2020INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jan 4, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Dec 5, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Apr 5, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Apr 5, 201971.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED
Apr 1, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Sep 17, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Apr 13, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED
Apr 13, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Apr 13, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 2, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jan 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 9, 2010LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jul 1, 2010LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 22, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 22, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jul 7, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 7, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 17, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 17, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 15, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Nov 21, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 17, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 10, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 26, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 26, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 17, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Nov 16, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Sep 20, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 30, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 13, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 13, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 9, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 28, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance