USPTO serial 79017044
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin W. Schiffmiller
Martin W. Schiffmiller Kirschstein Israel Schiffmiller & Pieron425 Fifth Avenue, 5th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10016-2223UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers [ ; mineral and aerated waters and non-alcoholic fruit juice drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups for making beverages ] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 15, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 9, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |