Drawing for BRUGSE ZOT

USPTO serial 79017044

BRUGSE ZOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3223236Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 27, 2007
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with BRUGSE ZOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin W. Schiffmiller

Martin W. Schiffmiller Kirschstein Israel Schiffmiller & Pieron425 Fifth Avenue, 5th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10016-2223UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beers [ ; mineral and aerated waters and non-alcoholic fruit juice drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups for making beverages ]ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 26, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 12, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 29, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 8, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jun 6, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jun 6, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 5, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 20, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Mar 27, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 15, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
May 15, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
May 15, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
May 15, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 26, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Apr 26, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jun 6, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 24, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 24, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 26, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 1, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 4, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 12, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 12, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 9, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 28, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance