Drawing for MARSHALL

USPTO serial 79017061

MARSHALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3247712Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 29, 2007
Examiner
JORDAN, AMEETA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with MARSHALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy C. Ziegler

Amy C. Ziegler GREER, BURNS & CRAIN, LTD.200 W. Madison St.Suite 2100CHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Sound amplifiers; [ sound reverberation units; ] electric sound mixing, processing and synthesising apparatus; [ microphones, ] headphones; loudspeakers, horn-type speakers, loudspeaker cabinets; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods [ ; calculators; CD cases ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 24, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2024ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Sep 24, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2023NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Oct 2, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 28, 2017INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 19, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 16, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 12, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 19, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Jun 21, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 18, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 23, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
May 23, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 31, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 22, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 10, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 26, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 26, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 25, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 5, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 3, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 31, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 18, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 2, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 2, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance