USPTO serial 79017126
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thilo C. Agthe
Thilo C. Agthe Wuersch & Gering LLP100 Wall Street, 10th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for processing food products and processing cocoa and chocolate, namely, [ grinder, ]mixers, blenders [, roller grinder for grinding of cocoa and chocolate mass, agitating mills for reducing and mixing cocoa and chocolate mass and food choppers for industrial use; machines, namely, conches for refining chocolate and static mixers; machine parts for regulating the abovementioned machines, namely, regulators that are a part of the abovementioned machines ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | [ Dose measuring equipment namely, a charge screw and balance for solid and pasty chocolate ingredients for use in the food processing field with cocoa; apparatus and instruments for low current installations, namely, electric switches, panels, power packs, and control circuits for use in machines for processing cocoa and chocolate; apparatus and instruments for storing data for machines and installations and for storing specific technical data relating to manufacturing processes of cocoa and chocolate products, namely, computers, computer memory hardware, and computer disc drives for storing data; apparatus and instruments for regulating and controlling dosing in-installations, seed crystallization installations, food processing machines, and static mixers, as well as for storing, namely, electronic control systems for machines, industrial process control software, electric control devices for controlling temperature in food processing machines, automatic liquid-flow control machines and instruments; apparatus for process monitoring, namely, computers and computer software for operating and controlling food processing and seed crystallization machines and processes ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ Provision of services in the field of science and technology and related research and development services, namely, scientific research and development; industrial research and analyses in the field of food processing; project studies and development of computers and computer programs, namely, conducting of feasibility studies and development of computer hardware and computer programs in the field of food processing and in the field of cocoa and chocolate processing; and legal counselling and representation ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 10, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 24, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 15, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | ISIC | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - INCOMING CORR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 19, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |