USPTO serial 79017137
OKITEKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3699010Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 20, 2009
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OKITEKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OKITEKS YÜN IPLIK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Orhangazi/BURSA, TR
Other trademarks owned by OKITEKS YÜN IPLIK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
OKITEKS YÜN IPLIK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Orhangazi/BURSA, TR
Other trademarks owned by OKITEKS YÜN IPLIK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
OKITEKS YÜN IPLIK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Orhangazi/BURSA, TR
Other trademarks owned by OKITEKS YÜN IPLIK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 023 | Chenille yarn, cotton thread and yarn, darning thread and yam, elastic thread and yarn for textile use, embroidery thread and yarn, hemp thread and yarn, jute thread and yarn, linen thread and yarn, rayon thread and yarn, rubber thread for textile use, sewing thread and yarn, silk thread and yarn, spun cotton, spun silk, spun thread and yarn, spun wool, woolen thread and yarn, worsted thread and yarn | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OKITEKS YÜN IPLIK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by OKITEKS YÜN IPLIK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by OKITEKS YÜN IPLIK SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 023
- Similar marks named OKITEKS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2016 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 4, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2008 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |