CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for AQUASIL

USPTO serial 79017161

AQUASIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3211571Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 20, 2007
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AQUASIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN ALUMIT

JOHN ALUMIT PATEL & ALUMIT PC16830 VENTURA BLVD STE 360ENCINO, CA 91436UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely, energy drinks and isotonic drinks, excluding vitamin-enhanced drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices; Concentrates, syrups or powders for making beverages, namely drinking water, energy drinks, isotonic drinks, fruit drinks and fruit juices, all excluding vitamin-enhanced drinksSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 7, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 19, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 13, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 23, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 5, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 20, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 29, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 3, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 3, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 3, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 3, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 15, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 15, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 12, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance