USPTO serial 79017241
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,300
RUD-Kettenfabrik Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co.
DE
Other trademarks owned by RUD-Kettenfabrik Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co.
RUD-Kettenfabrik Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co.
DE
Other trademarks owned by RUD-Kettenfabrik Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co.
RUD Ketten Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by RUD Ketten Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
RUD Ketten Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by RUD Ketten Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
RUD Ketten Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by RUD Ketten Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
RUD Ketten Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by RUD Ketten Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
RUD Ketten Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by RUD Ketten Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
RUD Ketten Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by RUD Ketten Rieger & Dietz GmbH u. Co. KG
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark P. Stone
Mark P. Stone Law Office of Mark P. Stone400 COLUMBUS AVE.VALHALLA, NY 10595UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal chains, chain links, link pins, chain joints, sprocket chains, swivel shackles; devices and components of metal for the securing, coupling, shortening, guiding and tensioning of chains, belts and/or ropes, namely, lifting and lashing points, load rings, master links, connectors, coupler links, swivel adaptors, shortening claws, shortening latches, shortening hooks, balancers, [ spreader bars, ] and tension adjusters; grabs, hooks, eyes, [ retaining loops, expansion braces, ]claws and shackles, of metal, for use in connection with chains, belts and/or ropes; metal clamping apparatus for lashing loads, namely, clamping jaws; [ metal loading pallets in the nature of loading forks; ] and shaped parts of metal, namely, chain links, bolts, chain joints, grabs, chain locks, chain swivels [, bands, and clips for chains, belts, cables, ropes ] ; catches for chains, belts, cables, and/or ropes; bolts, clasps for chains, belts, cables, and/or ropes; clamps, flanges, [ beams, ] forgings,[ bars, ][ brads, gratings,] and hardware, namely,[ pulleys,] springs, nuts and washers; hinges, hooks, identification plates, indicia tabs, [ latch bars, latches, ] locks, [ pulls, posts, pulleys, ] rigging chains, [ shims, strappings, cable thimbles, ] ring-shaped fittings, screw rings, steel forgings, [ and washers ] for chains, belts, cables and/or ropes; [ junction sleeves for chains, belts, cables and/or ropes; girders, cargo slings; ] all of the aforesaid of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Safety overload indicating elements in the form of chain links comprising indication webs bordering a calibrated slot | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 22, 2018 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2018 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 19, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |