USPTO serial 79017245
SINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 2, 2007
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Owner
Schunk GmbH & Co. KG Spann- und Greiftechnik
Lauffen/Neckar, DE
Other trademarks owned by Schunk GmbH & Co. KG Spann- und Greiftechnik
Schunk GmbH & Co. KG Fabrik für Spann- und Greifwerkzeuge
DE
Other trademarks owned by Schunk GmbH & Co. KG Fabrik für Spann- und Greifwerkzeuge
Schunk GmbH & Co. KG Spann- und Greiftechnik
DE
Other trademarks owned by Schunk GmbH & Co. KG Spann- und Greiftechnik
Schunk GmbH & Co. KG Spann- und Greiftechnik
DE
Other trademarks owned by Schunk GmbH & Co. KG Spann- und Greiftechnik
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph W. Berenato, III
Joseph W. Berenato, III Berenato & White, LLC6550 ROCK SPRING DR STE 240BETHESDA, MD 20817UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Schunk GmbH & Co. KG Spann- und Greiftechnik
- Other trademarks owned by Schunk GmbH & Co. KG Fabrik für Spann- und Greifwerkzeuge
- Other trademarks owned by Schunk GmbH & Co. KG Spann- und Greiftechnik
- Other trademarks owned by Schunk GmbH & Co. KG Spann- und Greiftechnik
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named SINO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 7, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 19, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 2, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |