Drawing for ECACC

USPTO serial 79017259

ECACC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3256573Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 26, 2007
Examiner
BELZER, LYDIA M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with ECACC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,046*

Plus Government fees of $2,600

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark B. Harrison

MARK B. HARRISON VENABLE LLPP.O. BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical substances for use in science or industry, namely, deoxyribonucleic acid; chemical substances for use in vitro use, namely, deoxyribonucleic acidACTIVE
005Diagnostic preparations for clinical or medical laboratory use derived from cell cultures; cell cultures for clinical or medical laboratory useACTIVE
041Arranging and conducting of conferences, seminars and training workshops in the field of cell cultures or their derivatives; education in the field of cell cultures rendered through correspondence courses; providing online publications in the field of cell cultures and their derivativesACTIVE
042Research services, research and development services, consultancy services, dissemination of information all in the field of biological, microbiological, microbial, genetic, chromosomal, environmental, biosafety, immunology, pharmacology or health mattersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 23, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jun 30, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 30, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 26, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Nov 7, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Nov 28, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 26, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED
Sep 26, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Sep 25, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 20, 201371AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED
Sep 20, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Aug 16, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 9, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 9, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 26, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 10, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 26, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 26, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 19, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 22, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 17, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 17, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 17, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 14, 2006UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED
Dec 14, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Dec 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 14, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 14, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 26, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 25, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 17, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 16, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 19, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 19, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 18, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 28, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance