Drawing for ALPIN FRESH

USPTO serial 79017265

ALPIN FRESH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3283179Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 21, 2007
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALPIN FRESH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Medicated candies with medicinal herbsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030Non-medicated candies with non-medical herbsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 5, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 4, 2019CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 5, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 30, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 28, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 8, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 2, 2011RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 12, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 28, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 5, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 10, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 26, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 26, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 14, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2007RGRRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 25, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 2, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 15, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance