Drawing for MARTELL NOBLIGE

USPTO serial 79017267

MARTELL NOBLIGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARTELL NOBLIGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines, wines spirits and liqueursSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Apr 16, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 5, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 29, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 10, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 26, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 26, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 25, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 25, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 2, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 18, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 12, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 28, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance