USPTO serial 79017313
BIO-FORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3324750Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 30, 2007
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIO-FORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AU
AU
AU
AU
AU
AU
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Milk and milk beverages with high milk content, milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yoghurt; yoghurt, yoghurt drinks, eggs, soy extracts for use as a food additive, whey, meat, fish, poultry, edible oils and edible fats; food preparations in this class containing nutritional and dietary supplements, in crystalline, granular, solid bar and powder form, namely preparations for making soup, soup mixes, soup pastes, dairy based beverages, dips, snack dips, snack mixes consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Flour; flour products and preparations, namely processed cereals, bread, pastries, rolls, and other bakery goods, namely energy chocolate bars, biscuits, fruit slices, yoghurt slices, cakes, confectionary, frozen confectionary, ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces; spices; coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; cereal-based snack foods, wheat based snack foods, grain based food bars also containing chocolate, cocoa, yoghurt and/or fruit; food preparations in this class containing nutritional and dietary supplements, in crystalline, granular, solid bar and powder form, namely cookie mixes, dough, extruded wheat snacks, granola based snack bars, grain based beverages, enriched flour | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | Seeds; fresh fruit and vegetables, foodstuffs for animals, malt for brewing and distilling | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Beers; mineral and aerated water; and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely punch, beers, beer worts, colas, ginger beers, drinking water, sports drinks, isotonic drinks, malt beverages, soft drinks, extracts of must, fruit drinks and fruit juices; and other preparations for making beverages, namely whey beverages, syrups, sports drinks, isotonic drinks, essences for use in making soft drinks, malt syrup for beverages; preparations for making nutritional and dietary supplements in the form of non-alcoholic beverages, namely whey beverages, syrups, sports drinks, isotonic drinks, essences for use in making soft drinks, malt syrup for beverages, fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Laucke Flour Mills Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Laucke Flour Mills Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Laucke Flour Mills Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Laucke, Mark
- Other trademarks owned by Laucke, Mark
- Other trademarks owned by Laucke, Mark
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named BIO-FORT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2015 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |