USPTO serial 79017338
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SOCIETE DE MECANIQUE MAGNETIQUE
F-27950 SAINT-MARCEL, FR
SOCIETE DE MECANIQUE MAGNETIQUE
F-27950 SAINT-MARCEL, FR
FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Fraser
Jennifer Fraser Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLPP.O. Box 2207WILMINGTON, DE 19899UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine tools, namely spindles, turbomachines, namely, turbocompressors and turbopumps not for land vehicles; machine parts, namely tool spindles; machine parts, namely, vacuum pumps, ball bearings, machine bearings, magnetic bearings; electric motors and engines for machines and not for land vehicles; transmission couplings and belts for machines and not for land vehicles | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 27, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 27, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |