Drawing for LEVITATED BY S2M MAGNETIC BEARINGS

USPTO serial 79017338

LEVITATED BY S2M MAGNETIC BEARINGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3109581Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 27, 2006
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEVITATED BY S2M MAGNETIC BEARINGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer Fraser

Jennifer Fraser Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLPP.O. Box 2207WILMINGTON, DE 19899UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machine tools, namely spindles, turbomachines, namely, turbocompressors and turbopumps not for land vehicles; machine parts, namely tool spindles; machine parts, namely, vacuum pumps, ball bearings, machine bearings, magnetic bearings; electric motors and engines for machines and not for land vehicles; transmission couplings and belts for machines and not for land vehiclesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 22, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 27, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Oct 5, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Oct 5, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Oct 3, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 3, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jun 27, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
May 21, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Feb 28, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Aug 3, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Aug 3, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Aug 3, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 15, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Mar 29, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 8, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 9, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 9, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Mar 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 27, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 4, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 16, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 9, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 30, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 20, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 20, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 23, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 7, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 6, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance