Drawing for VALUEMAX TOOLS

USPTO serial 79017382

VALUEMAX TOOLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3139352Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 5, 2006
Examiner
ALLEN, SUSAN EILEEN BI
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VALUEMAX TOOLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D. Schumann

Michael D. Schumann Hamre, Schumann, Mueller & Larson, P.C.P.O. Box 2902MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machine spare parts, namely, machine tools for the cutting of materials [ Machine assembly parts, namely, cutting blades; Machine assembly parts, namely, cutting blades for seats; Machine assembly parts, namely, knives; machine tools, namely, shearing tools; Machine spare parts, namely, power-operated grinding wheels; lathes for metalworking; power operated cutting tools for processing of taps; power operated cutting tools for processing of wheels; power operated cutting tools for broach-making ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Apr 17, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 22, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED
Mar 22, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Mar 22, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 28, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Feb 28, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 24, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 23, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Apr 23, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 28, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Sep 19, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Sep 5, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 5, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jun 13, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 24, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 20, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 24, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 24, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 24, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 24, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 16, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 20, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 16, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance