Drawing for SILUMA

USPTO serial 79017392

SILUMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3340090Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 20, 2007
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SILUMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JACQUELINE LEVASSEUR PATT

JACQUELINE LEVASSEUR PATT VENABLE LLP575 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20878UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Unprocessed plastics; unprocessed plastics incorporating sand as a filler; unprocessed plastics for industrial useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
019Building materials wholly or predominately of plastic, namely, roof tiles, gutters, doors, door frames and window frames, beams, boards, structural panels and insulating panels; plastic materials for construction purposes, namely, for construction of temporary and emergency housing, namely, doorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
020Articles made wholly or predominately of plastic material, namely, pallets, traffic cones, portable warnings and signing cones for use on highways; plastic storage boxes, and plastic storage drumsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jan 14, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 24, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 7, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jul 7, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Feb 27, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 27, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jun 19, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 4, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 23, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 21, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 20, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 1, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 30, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 19, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 19, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 17, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 3, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 3, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 14, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 24, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 24, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance