Drawing for PORCELATEC

USPTO serial 79017440

PORCELATEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3154391Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 10, 2006
Examiner
CARRUTHERS, SUE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PORCELATEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laurel V. Dineff, Linda J. Nowlin, Justin R. Young, R. Peter Spies

LAUREL V DINEFF DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED160 N WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Import, export, advertising, commercial agency, and retail and on-line store services featuring all types of articles, in particular, valves and fittings, metal structures for building, metal bath accessories, bath partitions and cubicles, sanitary installations, air conditioning apparatus, ventilation and heating apparatus, bathtubs, wash basins, shower trays, shower cubicles, non-metallic building materials, wall tiles, paving, ceramic linings, ceramic floor tiles, kitchen and bathroom furniture, magazines and publications, household ceramics, household and kitchen utensils or containers, glassware, porcelain and earthenware, household textile articles, carpets and parquetSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Sep 11, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 6, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 20, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Nov 20, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
May 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Nov 30, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 20, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 17, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 17, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 10, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 28, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 1, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 26, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 25, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 25, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 25, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 9, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 2, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 5, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 6, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 5, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance