Drawing for CBP CONSULTING ENGINEERS

USPTO serial 79017451

CBP CONSULTING ENGINEERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3516562Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 14, 2008
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CBP CONSULTING ENGINEERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DIANE G. ELDER

DIANE G ELDER FOLEY & LARDNER LLP321 N CLARK ST 29TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business administration and management for the building tradeSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
036Provision of financial information concerning building tradeSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
037Construction services of a building developer, namely, real estate development; construction and repair of buildings; installation operations, namely, installation of drywall panels, windows, electronic fixtures, cabinets and doors; provision of information about building repairs; construction supervision; construction consulting; construction planning; construction of building projects; facility management of infrastructural building management, namely, repair, service and maintenance of real estate; installation, repair and maintenance of heating equipment, namely, motors, heating apparatus and electronic apparatus; management and supervision of construction worksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Services of a building promoter, namely, architectural design, building design and land surveying; engineering, in particular by civil engineers; technical project management in the range of building trade and in the domain of services provided by engineers, including technology consultation and research in the field of engineering; operation of an engineering office for construction management, construction supervision and project controlling; operations of structural and civil engineeringSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 19, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 27, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 27, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jan 14, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 14, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 25, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 23, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 23, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 20, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 20, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 9, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Mar 7, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Feb 26, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 25, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 22, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Aug 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jun 22, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Jun 14, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 11, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 17, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 3, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 3, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Aug 14, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Jul 12, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 12, 2006CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Jun 30, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 29, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 29, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 13, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 13, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 12, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance