USPTO serial 79017460
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | FOOD PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, INSTANT SOUP BASED ON HERBS IN THE FORM OF TABLETS, CAPSULES, POWDERS, GELS OR LIQUID EXTRACTS, ALL CONTAINING LEPIDIUM MAYNEII (MACA TUBER); PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, INSTANT SOUP BASED ON TUBERS, HERBS AND FRUITS, ALL CONTAINING LEPIDIUM MAYENII (MACA TUBER); PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, INSTANT SOUP BASED ON MACA TUBER (LEPIDIUM MEYENII) | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Drinks based on herbs, namely, energy drinks, all containing lepidium meyenii (maca tuber); preparations, namely, syrups, based on herbs for the preparation of drinks, namely, energy drinks, in the form of powders or gels or liquid extracts, all containing lepidium meyenii (maca tuber); drinks and preparations based on tubers, cereals, herbs and fruits, namely, energy drinks and syrups for making energy drinks, all containing lepidium meyenii (maca tuber); drinks and preparations based on maca tuber (lepidium meyerii), namely, syrups for making energy drinks, and energy drinks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 9, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 9, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2007 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |