Drawing for GOMASHABU

USPTO serial 79017474

GOMASHABU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3223243Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 27, 2007
Examiner
FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with GOMASHABU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

Howard N. Aronson LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLP1 Chase RdLackenbach Siegel BuildingScarsdale, NY 10583

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030DIPPING SAUCE FOR SHABU-SHABU, COMPRISED PRIMARILY OF SOY SAUCE, RICE WINE, SESAME PASTE AND VINEGARACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jun 5, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Apr 4, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 7, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Mar 7, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Mar 6, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Mar 27, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Sep 24, 2015CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 20, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 23, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Mar 23, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Mar 23, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Mar 23, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 1, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Oct 19, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 24, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 24, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 20, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 9, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 18, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 13, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 13, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 12, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 30, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 10, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 10, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 9, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2006RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW
Feb 17, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance