Drawing for UCOM

USPTO serial 79017477

UCOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3230030Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 17, 2007
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with UCOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for crushing and processing solids, namely, oil seeds, manures, sugar, citric acid, non-organic pigments, instant coffee, starches, metal powders, coating powders, cosmetics, fillers, ceramics, spices, plastics or similar materials, in particular milling and grinding installations with closed air-induction systems; parts and fittings for the aforesaid machinesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 2, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Dec 28, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Dec 28, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Dec 28, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 20, 2016EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED
May 23, 2016PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71
May 23, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 3, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Apr 17, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 15, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Nov 13, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Nov 13, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Nov 8, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Nov 8, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 12, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 9, 2012PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15
Jul 6, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 17, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 3, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 3, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 25, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 17, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 30, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 10, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 6, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 5, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 16, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 1, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 31, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED
Oct 23, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Sep 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 15, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 12, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 20, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 20, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 20, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 16, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance