USPTO serial 79017477
UCOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 17, 2007
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with UCOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Owner
Bauermeister Zerkleinerungstechnik GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by Bauermeister Zerkleinerungstechnik GmbH
Bauermeister Zerkleinerungstechnik GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by Bauermeister Zerkleinerungstechnik GmbH
Bauermeister Zerkleinerungstechnik GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by Bauermeister Zerkleinerungstechnik GmbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norman B. Thot
Norman B. Thot Patent Law Offices of Dr. Norman B. ThotP.O. BOX 10 17 56RATINGEN, 40837GERMANYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for crushing and processing solids, namely, oil seeds, manures, sugar, citric acid, non-organic pigments, instant coffee, starches, metal powders, coating powders, cosmetics, fillers, ceramics, spices, plastics or similar materials, in particular milling and grinding installations with closed air-induction systems; parts and fittings for the aforesaid machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bauermeister Zerkleinerungstechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Bauermeister Zerkleinerungstechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Bauermeister Zerkleinerungstechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named UCOM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2016 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| May 23, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 3, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 17, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |