USPTO serial 79017495
MIRAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3204173Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 30, 2007
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIRAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
E-42320 Langa de Duero (Soria), ES
E-42320 Langa de Duero (Soria), ES
E-42320 Langa de Duero (Soria), ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JANE F. COLLEN
JANE F COLLEN COLLEN IPTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG80 S HIGHLAND AVE TOWN OF OSSININGOSSINING, NY 10562-5615Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2014 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |