USPTO serial 79017502
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
FR
FR
FR
FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann K. Ford
Ann K. Ford DLA Piper LLP (US)500 Eighth Street, NWWashington, DC 20004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Compotes, jams, fruit coulis, jellies; savory and sweet snack goods made with fruit or vegetables such as potatoes, flavored and plain, namely, fruit-based snack foods, potato-based snack foods; potato chips, dried fruit mixes, prepared nut products, namely, prepared walnuts,hazelnuts, peanuts and cashew nuts; milk, milk powder, flavored jellied milks in the nature of milk-based beverages containing fruits; whipped milk products, namely, whipped milk, whipped cream; milk products, namely, milk desserts in the nature of cottage cheese with fruits, dairy-based whipped topping; yogurts, drinking yogurts, and cheese based mousses, creams, fresh cream, butter, soft white cheese, plain or flavored fresh cheese in paste or liquid form in the nature of cheese spreads and cheese fondue; beverages mainly consisting of milk or milk products, milk beverages with high milk content, milk beverages containing fruits; plain or flavored fermented milk products, namely, fermented milk | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, chocolate, prepared coffee-based beverages, prepared cocoa-based beverages, chocolate-based beverages, namely, hot chocolate, chocolate-based food beverage not being dairy-based or vegetable based; sweet and savory tarts and pies, pizzas; cereal preparations, namely, processed cereals, cereal-based snack foods, breakfast cereals; bread,rusks, sweet and savory biscuits, wafers, waffles, cakes, pastries; all being plain, topped, filled,and flavored; savory and sweet cocktail snack goods containing baking dough, biscuit mixture or pastry mixture, namely, bread sticks, crackers, muffins, pastry shells; confectionery, namely,candy, chocolate, confectionery chips for baking, crystal sugar pieces, confectionery ices, namely, frozen yogurt, fruit jellies, peanut butter confectionery chips, edible ices, ice cream, sherbets, frozen yogurt and, flavored frozen water | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Mineral and non mineral still and sparkling water; fruit and vegetable juices, fruit and vegetable-based beverages not being food beverages; lemonades, soft drinks, ginger beers,sherbets being beverages; preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit drinks, syrups for beverages, non-alcoholic fruit and vegetable extracts used for preparing beverages; non-alcoholic beverages containing lactic ferments, namely, smoothies | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2016 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 3, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |